I'm not na•ve enough to think that I was going to change Mr. Voiles' mind when it comes to comic book culture and how it is perceived in wake of the Aurora shooting, but at the very least I was hoping for him to see my point of view (which is a point of view shared by many people, I've come to find out). But alas that is not the case. I do, however, find it ironic that someone keeps criticizing comic books culture when in actuality they appear to be the one in fantasy land. If Mr. Voiles thinks for one second that those other three letters-to-the editor helped validate his original argument, he's not fully grasping what was being stated in those letters.
For example, with regard to my letter, Mr. Voiles and I agree that comic books are geared toward a more adult audience. There's no disputing that, but he goes on to use that rationale to then validate the rest of his arguments. That initial point was never in doubt.
When one ÒconcedesÓ something, one is acknowledging an agreement; however even though we agree on that one minor point, that one concession does not therefore validate every other opinion that Mr. Voiles was stating.
That is making connections where they do not exist. And I get the impression that he might be the only one making those leaps because the feedback I received from the community after I penned my first letter was overwhelmingly supportive and positive.
Mr. Voiles states that ÒThe case is made that some no doubt maladjusted individuals are influenced by the comic book genre in an unhealthy way.Ó He contends this was basically his point all along. Unfortunately, for us fans of the comics, he arrived at that point in his first letter in a very convoluted and condescending manner where he, knowingly or not, insulted many people who enjoy comic book culture.
Additionally, he threw an entire industry (really two: comic publishers and movie studios) under the bus, while admitting he didn't know much about it in the first place.
Secondly, and this goes to a larger point that apparently I stated too implicitly, Ñ because I do not want to give the shooter even more notoriety Ñbut when one argues that the shooter (a maladjusted individual) was Ò . . . influenced by the comic book genre in an unhealthy way,Ó what specifically does that mean?
On the surface, especially with the initial reports-, it appears the shooter has an unhealthy relationship with comics and Batman. Drawing conclusions from that would lead one to think that the shooter was ÒinfluencedÓ by the comic book genre in a detrimental way.
But my point of contention is this: Mr. Voiles states no other reasons for what motivated the shooter to do what he did. And it would be reasonable to therefore ascertain from Mr. Voiles' point of view and of his arguments that the influence of comics must have been the sole reason for the shooting spree Ñbecause again Ñhe mentions no other motives.
And it's this narrow-minded, black-and-white line of thinking that disturbs and frustrates me. To just blindly belittle and squarely blame the culture of comics on this tragedy is to thus then ignore other larger issues (that seem to be) at play: Mental illness, inability to deal with stress and (allegedly) prescription drug abuse, just to name a few.
Again I'm hesitant to bring up a lot of this because there is a trial that is currently ongoing and as I stated in my original letter, and contrary to what others may or may not imply, we do not know all the facts in this case.
But I do think it is reasonable to presume (and I will stand by this notion) that while it is clear that comic book culture played some part in the shooter's life it is reckless to thereby assume that being associated with fantasy culture directly led to the movie-theater tragedy. Conjecture like that presupposes certain elements while ignoring other causes of concern.
In essence, maybe all I accomplished was just a regurgitation of my original argument. But I'm not going to sit idly by while someone just incessantly shouts their sentiments on a topic simply because they feel that because they have an opinion on that particular subject that one, they feel that it is an opinion worth sharing and two, that people want to hear what they have to say. I know that isn't always the case, though I'm quite convinced that is the case here.
I'm just going to end this letter on a lighter note with this little aside: I used to work with a senior gentlemen who had a litany of colorful expressions and I can think of none more apt in this case than when he used to say, "sometimes . . . you'd be better off talking to a brick wall."
- Letters to the Editor
- Six decades of problems To the Editor:I am writing today about something that has been bugging me for 64 years. It is about my addition, called Highland, and the problems we have had with city government.I bought two lots in 1950 from Sheldon Alvreson. We had our house buil
- letter to the editor Tri Kappa grateful for successful parade Dear Editor:Tri Kappa would like to extend our appreciation to all those involved in helping make the Fourth of July Parade possible again this year. We appreciate Porter-Oliger-Pearson Funeral Home for the us
- Starting the conversation To the Editor:This is a subject that is always in the news. It is drugs, mainly marijuana. I was at my dermatologist’s, Dr. Dubois, the other day and we were discussing Colorado making marijuana legal and the state of Indiana making it legal for medi
- Fair share in property taxes When the Legislature’s Blue Ribbon Commission begins its look at the state’s taxes this summer, there will be talk of business needing to pay its “fair share.” But what is fair?Hoosier companies currently pay 50% of the state’s total property tax. Sh
- Great crowd for parade To the Editor:The 2014 fair parade was just awesome. I want to thank Joyce Holtkamp for inviting me to participate. Also, I want to thank Ortman Farms for the use of the hay wagon (during baling season no less), the Blasdel family for a place to stor
- Hope is eternal To the Editor:This is a subject I don’t really know how to address. In our lives, we have all had something we knew was unattainable, but couldn’t let go.It may be a job or it may be social standing, and we’ve all had love that we knew was not to be.
- Weighing in on the airport expansion In the Greensburg Daily News (GDN) article of 6-17-14 titled “Proposed Airport Expansion To Boost Job Creation, Officials Say”.... one thing lacking is current statistics to support anything stated.Industries are changing and we must change with them
- The debate on E-cigarettes The debate on E-cigarettesDear Editor:Here comes the sound of anti-smokers talking about the harms of e-cigarettes, you know the ones that burn no tobacco, only heat up a solution containing nicotine. No harms are known either to the smoker or anyone
- The finest man I’ve known The finest man I've known Dear Editor: I am writing today about a person in my life whom was one of the finest people I have ever known. I am writing about Mose Levenstein. We had two in town, then one was Store Mose and the other was Junkyard Mose.
- Passion for purple Passion for purple Dear Editor: Every October, the country goes pink in support of breast cancer research. It's a beautiful sight. The underlying message is one of a vast network of support from family, friends, and total strangers. I would love to
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines