I'm not na•ve enough to think that I was going to change Mr. Voiles' mind when it comes to comic book culture and how it is perceived in wake of the Aurora shooting, but at the very least I was hoping for him to see my point of view (which is a point of view shared by many people, I've come to find out). But alas that is not the case. I do, however, find it ironic that someone keeps criticizing comic books culture when in actuality they appear to be the one in fantasy land. If Mr. Voiles thinks for one second that those other three letters-to-the editor helped validate his original argument, he's not fully grasping what was being stated in those letters.
For example, with regard to my letter, Mr. Voiles and I agree that comic books are geared toward a more adult audience. There's no disputing that, but he goes on to use that rationale to then validate the rest of his arguments. That initial point was never in doubt.
When one ÒconcedesÓ something, one is acknowledging an agreement; however even though we agree on that one minor point, that one concession does not therefore validate every other opinion that Mr. Voiles was stating.
That is making connections where they do not exist. And I get the impression that he might be the only one making those leaps because the feedback I received from the community after I penned my first letter was overwhelmingly supportive and positive.
Mr. Voiles states that ÒThe case is made that some no doubt maladjusted individuals are influenced by the comic book genre in an unhealthy way.Ó He contends this was basically his point all along. Unfortunately, for us fans of the comics, he arrived at that point in his first letter in a very convoluted and condescending manner where he, knowingly or not, insulted many people who enjoy comic book culture.
Additionally, he threw an entire industry (really two: comic publishers and movie studios) under the bus, while admitting he didn't know much about it in the first place.
Secondly, and this goes to a larger point that apparently I stated too implicitly, Ñ because I do not want to give the shooter even more notoriety Ñbut when one argues that the shooter (a maladjusted individual) was Ò . . . influenced by the comic book genre in an unhealthy way,Ó what specifically does that mean?
On the surface, especially with the initial reports-, it appears the shooter has an unhealthy relationship with comics and Batman. Drawing conclusions from that would lead one to think that the shooter was ÒinfluencedÓ by the comic book genre in a detrimental way.
But my point of contention is this: Mr. Voiles states no other reasons for what motivated the shooter to do what he did. And it would be reasonable to therefore ascertain from Mr. Voiles' point of view and of his arguments that the influence of comics must have been the sole reason for the shooting spree Ñbecause again Ñhe mentions no other motives.
And it's this narrow-minded, black-and-white line of thinking that disturbs and frustrates me. To just blindly belittle and squarely blame the culture of comics on this tragedy is to thus then ignore other larger issues (that seem to be) at play: Mental illness, inability to deal with stress and (allegedly) prescription drug abuse, just to name a few.
Again I'm hesitant to bring up a lot of this because there is a trial that is currently ongoing and as I stated in my original letter, and contrary to what others may or may not imply, we do not know all the facts in this case.
But I do think it is reasonable to presume (and I will stand by this notion) that while it is clear that comic book culture played some part in the shooter's life it is reckless to thereby assume that being associated with fantasy culture directly led to the movie-theater tragedy. Conjecture like that presupposes certain elements while ignoring other causes of concern.
In essence, maybe all I accomplished was just a regurgitation of my original argument. But I'm not going to sit idly by while someone just incessantly shouts their sentiments on a topic simply because they feel that because they have an opinion on that particular subject that one, they feel that it is an opinion worth sharing and two, that people want to hear what they have to say. I know that isn't always the case, though I'm quite convinced that is the case here.
I'm just going to end this letter on a lighter note with this little aside: I used to work with a senior gentlemen who had a litany of colorful expressions and I can think of none more apt in this case than when he used to say, "sometimes . . . you'd be better off talking to a brick wall."
- Letters to the Editor
- Letter to the editor Okay, fair is fair Dear Editor: Two days into the roll-out of The Affordable Care Act, I wrote a rather scathing letter relating the repeated failed attempts by my wife and me to enroll her in one of the new government approved health care plans. Sh
- Indy cop no longer 'exemplary' Dear Editor: In reporting on the recent court case involving an Indianapolis police officer, an Indianapolis television reporter just announced that "Officer Bisard had been an exemplary officer for years." I would offer a different take, to-wit: I'm
- The advantages of animal adoption Dear Editor: Many people have heard the saying "For every puppy bought, a pound puppy dies." Well, here are the statistics to back up that statement: According to the HSUS (www.humanesociety.org), nearly 8 million animals end up in shelters every ye
- The importance of facts Dear Editor: This letter is a response to K.B. Redelman's letter to the editor on Greensburg resident Hershel Houk's questions for Mayor Herbert published last week in the Daily News. Do you know Hershel Houk? It is obvious that you may know the Mayo
- Main Street Greensburg offers thanks Dear Editor: Main Street Greensburg would like to thank the following groups for weathering the cold and helping install the holiday decorations on the courthouse lawn this past Saturday: Greensburg Junior Optimists Club, Greensburg Rotary, ETC and D
- Letters to the editor A letter rebuttal Dear Editor: This letter is in response to Hershel Houk's recent letter to the editor. In his letter, Mr. Houk asked how much of a raise the Mayor gave himself. My answer would be that whatever he gets, he earns. It is not an easy j
- Take a grim lesson from the Native Americans Dear Editor: Given the prevailing mood of "let's attack the Federal Government," I believe it behooves us to address the controversy between those who believe in a strong federal government and those who just as strongly believe in state's rights, me
- Beware those 'heathen' Catholics Dear Editor: I continue to be amazed that hidebound Republicans continue to defend, even admire, the actions of Sarah Palin, who continues to demonstrate her slim grasp on reality and seeming lack of ordinary intelligence. What prompts this letter is
- In support of the fair tax bill Dear Editor: At the most recent Tree City Tea Party meeting of 11-9-13 , we heard a presentation by Mr. Jerry R. Lowman, the 6th district representative on the FAIR TAX. Through his presentation he explained the difference between the FAIR TAX and th
- Thank you for supporting the Alzheimer's walk Dear Editor: On behalf of team Memory Keepers, I am extending a heartfelt thank you to my family, friends, neighbors and community for your outstanding support of the 2013 Walk to End Alzheimer's. I have so many people to thank for their generous don
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines